Divestment?
This weekend the Palestinian Solidarity Movement will be hosting their annual conference at Georgetown University in Washington DC. The PSM organizers wish to use “divestment” as a way of putting political and economic pressure on Israel. This strategy has failed miserably at every university where it has been put forward. No school that has hosted previous PSM conferences has adopted the divestment tactic. Here is what some university officials around the country have said on the issue.When divestment was proposed at Columbia University, President Bollinger discarded the attempt to defame Israel as “grotesque and offensive.” Barnard President Shapiro voiced her clear “opposition to a divestment demand that singles out one country in an unsupportable way.” President Summers of Harvard, categorically rejecting the proposal at his university, said that Harvard is “not an institutional organ for advocacy on such a complex and controversial international conflict.” Georgetown has already followed suit: President DeGioia stated unambiguously, “I do not support divestment from Israel.”
Thomas Friedman of the New York Times has written: “criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic, and saying so is vile. But singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction — out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East — is anti-Semitic, and not saying so is dishonest.” PSM may be allowed to voice their criticism of Israel on our campuses, but we in the pro-Israel community should be aware of this type of bigotry.